Barack Obama Will Support The Cause of Jihad

"Stafford, Va. - Osama bin Laden must be chuckling in his safe house. After all, the 2008 campaign could very well give Al Qaeda the ultimate propaganda tool: President Barack Hussein Obama, Muslim apostate.

The fact that Senator Obama – the son of a Muslim father – insists he was never a Muslim before becoming Christian is irrelevant to bin Laden. In bin Laden's eyes, Obama is a murtad fitri, the worst type of apostate, because he was blessed by Allah to be born into the true faith of Islam.

There are two types of apostates according to sharia (Islamic law) and the Hadith (sayings of the prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him).

The first type is murtad milli, one who converted to Islam and later renounced the faith. The second, and most egregious, type is murtad fitri. It refers to a person born of a Muslim father who renounces his birthright. Two recent examples of the latter are Magdi Allam (a male Egyptian who converted to Catholicism in Italy) and Ayaan Hirsi Ali (Somali-born woman who's now an atheist). Both now face death threats.

According to Islamic jurisprudence, children of a Muslim father – even an apparently nonpracticing one, such as Obama's father, and irrespective of the mother's faith – are automatically Muslims. Most Muslims around the world agree: A child of a Muslim father is a Muslim. Period.

Should Obama become US commander in chief, there is a strong likelihood that Al Qaeda's media arm, As-Sahab, will exploit his background to argue that an apostate is leading the global war on terror (read: attacks against fellow Muslims). This perception would be leveraged to galvanize sympathizers into action."

- from http://www.csmonitor.com/2008/0519/p09s02-coop.html

feel free to view the entire thing.

Democrats Rid the U.S. of Democracy

" 'Superdelegate' is an informal term commonly used for some of the delegates to the Democratic National Convention, the presidential nominating convention of the United States Democratic Party.

Unlike most convention delegates, the superdelegates are not selected based on the party primaries and caucuses in each U.S. state, in which voters choose among candidates for the party's presidential nomination. Instead, most of the superdelegates are seated automatically, based solely on their status as current or former party leaders and elected officials ("PLEOs"). Others are chosen during the primary season. All the superdelegates are free to support any candidate for the nomination.

The Democratic Party rules do not use the term "superdelegate". This article follows the most common media practice in using the term "superdelegate" to refer to unpledged delegates, who fall into two categories:

• delegates seated based on other positions they hold, who are formally described (in Rule 9.A) as "unpledged party leader and elected official delegates"^[1] (unpledged PLEO delegates); and
• additional unpledged delegates selected by each state party (in a fixed predetermined number), who are formally described (in Rule 9.B) as "unpledged add-on delegates" and who need not hold any party or elected position before their selection as delegates.^[1]

Unpledged PLEO delegates should not be confused with pledged PLEOs. Under Rule 9.C, the pledged PLEO slots are allocated to candidates based on the results of the primaries and caucuses.^[1] Another difference between pledged PLEOs and unpledged PLEOs is that there is a fixed number of pledged PLEO slots for each state, while the number of unpledged PLEOs can change during the campaign. Pledged PLEO delegates are not generally considered superdelegates."*

"At the 2008 Democratic National Convention the superdelegates will make up approximately one-fifth of the total number of delegates. The closeness of the race between the leading contenders, Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama, has increased the chance that the superdelegates will play a decisive role in selecting the nominee, a prospect that has caused unease among some Democratic Party leaders."*

Need I provide the world with any more reason not to vote democratic? One-fifth of this years democratic caucus is not a vote at all, its rigged! The superdelegates aren't pledged to a state or, it would seem, to any form of democracy. They could all e-mail each other today and decide who they want to be the next democratic candidate for president. Their power is enormous, especially in an election like this years, where the public vote will be almost 50-50. Swaying twenty percent of a 50-50 election is like not holding an election. Support democracy: Vote Republican.

*indicates from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superdelegate

Marines Take Control of the Skies

The U.S. Marines are implementing the use of a new force-projection, air superiority platform: The F-35 JSF(Joint Strike Fighter) The F-35 is the product of many NATO nations working together, largely the United States and Great Brittain. The Marine version of this planes is the worlds first all-stealth platform to have the capability of vertical take-off and landing. For more information on this aircraft, visit http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ac/f-35.htm

The use of this aircraft will take the Marines into a new era of aerial domination, and no other fighting force will be recieving this variant of the F-35.

Why vote Democratic?

Well, it's happening again: The nation is being swept by liberal madness, logic is tossed to the curb, and illogical people are flocking to inconsistent leaders, content with claiming that sweeping change is what America needs.

Personally, I'm fine without change. I think things have been going well for the past 8 years. Sure: We're in a war. Look at American history: When are we not in a war? At least this one is a war for liberty and the prevention of terrorism. OH WAIT, I forgot that the liberals are claiming that this is a war for oil. Well, if that's the case, then we are terrible at fighting wars, since gas prices are setting records every day.

So let's take a moment and look at the records of one of every Liberal's favorite persons:

Hillary Clinton.

Specifically, lets see how good she is at telling the truth:

Lies that she's admitted to-

1. She was named after Sir Edmund Hillary. (She admitted she was wrong- he climbed Everest five years after her birth.)
2. Her daughter(Chealsea) was jogging around the World Trade Center on Sept. 11 (Actually, she was in bed)
3. She was under sniper fire in Bosnia. (Videos have surfaced otherwise- but she keeps on digging her grave deeper by trying to keep this one covered up)
4. She called one of her former supporters "Judas" (Ok, that one's not a lie but I thought I'd throw it in there)
5. She claims that she was on the soccer team in highschool. (Which is unlikey, since there was no soccer team at her highschool during the 1960's)

Well, I could pretty much go on forever, there's plenty of this stuff on the internet, just look up "Hillary's Lies," and expect a lot of hits. And what is it with superdelegates, just another way that the Democrats are trying to take control away from the people? I think so. Its a conspiracy: A way that a candidate can win the nomination easily without winning the popular vote.

There are a lot of other bones to pick with the Democrats, and the Republicans have their share of imperfections as well, but, when compared to either of the Democratic candidates, John McCain should be the obvious choice to the American people. And he is, which is why he has developed a 8 point lead over Barrack Obama and a 7 point lead over Hillary Clinton in the latest Rasmussen polls.*

* According to RealClearPolitics.com

America With Liberals in Office

Regardless of which of the democrats get into office, if either of them do we will all have some fun things to look forward to. For example:

1. Murdering babies would be legal.

2. There would be more taxes, especialy with Hilary, but at least she would have more money to build airports for Tyson foods....

3. Our constitutional right to bear arms will be revoked. But then, a dictatorship would never succeed if the people were armed now would it?

4. The government will raise taxes on bussinesess especialy, that way they won't have as money to reinvest, so the economy wil flop, I can't wait...

5. The free market economy will be violated when the liberals decide to nationalize health care, which will cause quality in the medical world to go down, since their is no way the government can run every medical outlet in the United States.

6. The American military will be "downsized," and Bill Clinton will throw a party to celebrate.

7. We will pull out of Iraq, the democratic Iraqie government will topple, Alqaida and other terrorists groups will start to, well, terrorize, neighboring countries will become involved, and the entire middle east will be in even worse shape than it is now.

8. The U.S. will probably be attacked by terrorists again, since radical Islam will now stand unchallenged as the dominant force in the middle east. They will easily be able to focus their efforts on attacking us, since they don't have to worry about survival anymore...

Good Times!

Kudos to the Dems for all of their GREAT ideas!

Barrack Obama

So what's the deal? Mr. Obama claims that he is a Christian(Mormon), but I've heard some interesting facts which would hint otherwise. For example: Mr. "Christian's" name used to be Barry, but he changed it in college to what it is now. Why would an American change their name from an English one to an Arabic one? I think I smell a convert.....